Maricopa Recorder Heap Defends Noncitizen Referrals After Only 8 of 60 Confirmed

Maricopa Recorder Heap Defends Noncitizen Referrals After Only 8 of 60 Confirmed

PHOENIX — Maricopa County Recorder Justin Heap faced sharp questions from the Board of Supervisors this week after prosecutors found that only eight of 60 suspected noncitizen voters his office referred were confirmed noncitizens — days before early voting ramps up in Arizona’s largest county.

Heap had flagged more than 200 voters as possible noncitizens using Motor Vehicle Division data and the federal SAVE citizenship-verification system. County Attorney Rachel Mitchell’s office reviewed 60 of those cases and concluded most stemmed from voter-registration errors rather than citizenship problems. The eight confirmed noncitizens who voted were in the country legally; no charges have been filed, and Mitchell has said the number is too small to sway an election.

Supervisor Steve Gallardo criticized the “pretty harsh language” in Heap’s public statements about the referred cases. Heap replied that his office is not an investigative agency and can only check databases. “We are not an investigative agency. We can only check; we check the databases,” he said during the board exchange covered by local television.

Mitchell urged fixes so database mismatches do not cast doubt on election security. Heap agreed the root problem sits largely in MVD systems and said lawmakers should streamline statutes, while insisting SAVE remains a useful longtime tool his office will keep using.

Most of the original 207 referrals remain under review. Those voters stay on the rolls but are marked “not eligible”: they cannot receive mail ballots and must prove citizenship in person before casting a vote. Maricopa County counts more than 2.5 million active voters heading into November.

The episode quickly spilled into statewide politics. In Wednesday’s secretary of state debate, Democrat Adrian Fontes cited the low confirmation rate as evidence that “election-denier” narratives about vast illegal voting are overblown. Republican Alexander Kolodin argued that a limited sample of roughly 60,000 records implies more cases may exist and that even one unlawful ballot dilutes lawful votes.

With early ballots already moving and national attention fixed on Arizona’s midterms, Heap’s referrals — and Mitchell’s partial clearing of the list — give both parties fresh ammunition over voter-roll integrity, even as the confirmed illegal-vote count remains in the single digits.

Election administrators nationwide have debated SAVE and state motor-vehicle mismatches for years. Citizenship databases can lag naturalizations, name changes, and dual-status records; registration forms can carry outdated marks that look like noncitizen flags until a human review clears them. Mitchell’s office effectively illustrated that gap: most of the first 60 cases were paperwork problems, not a hidden electorate of illegal voters.

Still, the incomplete review of 147 remaining names leaves a political vacuum. Advocacy groups on the right argue unfinished cases prove the need for stricter ID and citizenship checks before mail ballots go out. Voting-rights groups counter that marking voters “not eligible” without completed investigations risks suppressing eligible citizens — especially naturalized Arizonans — who must now appear in person with documents during a compressed early-voting window.

Heap’s defense that recorders only “check the databases” will face a practical test once early ballots are mailed and provisional lines form. Supervisors want confidence restored before November; campaigns want a narrative. Between those pressures sits Maricopa’s 2.5 million voters, most of whom will never appear on any referral list but will feel every headline about who belongs on the rolls.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *